[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8581.1559059917@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 17:11:57 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: Fix logically dead code in afs_update_cell
Marc Dionne <marc.c.dionne@...il.com> wrote:
> > diff --git a/fs/afs/cell.c b/fs/afs/cell.c
> > index 9c3b07ba2222..980de60bf060 100644
> > --- a/fs/afs/cell.c
> > +++ b/fs/afs/cell.c
> > @@ -387,7 +387,6 @@ static int afs_update_cell(struct afs_cell *cell)
> > if (ret == -ENOMEM)
> > goto out_wake;
> >
> > - ret = -ENOMEM;
> > vllist = afs_alloc_vlserver_list(0);
> > if (!vllist)
> > goto out_wake;
>
> Looks like the intention here was to return -ENOMEM when
> afs_alloc_vlserver_list fails, which would mean that the fix should
> move the assignment within if (!vllist), rather than just removing it.
> Although it might be fine to just return the error that came from
> afs_dns_query instead, as you do in this patch.
I think I'd rather return the original error as this patch effects. I'm
having a ponder on it.
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists