lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd075387-8b54-ed48-f480-bd673df88ac3@ti.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 May 2019 19:47:36 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <pavel@....cz>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/9] dt: bindings: lp50xx: Introduce the lp50xx family
 of RGB drivers

Rob

On 5/24/19 3:50 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2019 14:08:18 -0500, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Introduce the bindings for the Texas Instruments LP5036, LP5030, LP5024 and
>> LP5018 RGB LED device driver.  The LP5036/30/24/18 can control RGB LEDs
>> individually or as part of a control bank group.  These devices have the ability
>> to adjust the mixing control for the RGB LEDs to obtain different colors
>> independent of the overall brightness of the LED grouping.
>>
>> Datasheet:
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5024.pdf
>> http://www.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/lp5036.pdf
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>> ---
>>   .../devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.txt  | 142 ++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 142 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/leds-lp50xx.txt
>>
> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
> there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
> maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.
>
> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.

I usually provide the tags but in my cover letter I did indicate that 
these patchsets have changed pretty dramatically so I did not feel right 
about pulling in anyones tags.

Adding your reviewed by on a binding that changed did not seem right to me.

Dan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ