linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] leds: multicolor: Add sysfs interface definition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 27 May 2019 19:45:34 -0500
From:   Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:     <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] leds: multicolor: Add sysfs interface definition

Pavel

On 5/27/19 5:33 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Thu 2019-05-23 14:08:12, Dan Murphy wrote:
>> Add a documentation of LED Multicolor LED class specific
>> sysfs attributes.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
>> ---
>>   .../ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-multicolor    | 57 +++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 57 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-multicolor
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-multicolor b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-multicolor
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..2f102ede258b
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-class-led-multicolor
>> @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
>> +What:		/sys/class/leds/<led>/colors/sync_enable
>> +Date:		April 2019
> I believe I suggested more reasonable interface. Why not use that?
>

Can you please provide the reference to your interface?

These patchsets have been around for a while (Decemeber 2018) and I 
cannot seem to find the reference to your suggestion.

The suggestion may have been mired in the brightness model discussions.

So I don't want to over look what you suggested as it may be more 
reasonable then what I have implemented.

Dan