linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] crypto: gcm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM6PR09MB3523C09EFDE90A8A8ECFCA09D2180@AM6PR09MB3523.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Thu, 30 May 2019 14:29:26 +0000
From:   Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@...idesecure.com>
To:     Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:     Iuliana Prodan <iuliana.prodan@....com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@....com>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] crypto: gcm - fix cacheline sharing

> On Thu, 30 May 2019 at 15:58, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:45:47PM +0000, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
> > >
> > > On the current structure of caamalg, to work, iv needs to be copied
> > > before memcpy(iv, req->iv, ivsize), from skcipher_edesc_alloc
> function.
> > > For this we need edesc, but this cannot be allocated before knowing
> how
> > > much memory we need. So, to make it work, we'll need to modify more in
> CAAM.
> >
> > All the copying does is:
> >
> >         if (ivsize)
> >                 scatterwalk_map_and_copy(req->iv, req->src, req-
> >cryptlen -
> >                                          ivsize, ivsize, 0);
> >
> > Why do you need to allocate the edesc before doing this?
> >
> 
> Because that is where the incoming iv is currently consumed. Copying
> it out like this wipes the input IV from memory.

I had a similar problem for the Inside Secure driver: for decrypt operations,
you need to copy the output IV from your input data buffer (it's the last 
input data cipher block) but you need to do that *before* you start the
hardware, as for in-place operations, it is overwritten.

At the same time, you cannot store it to req->iv yet, because that still
contains the input IV that you need for processing the first block.

The only solution I could come up with, is to park it in some temporary
buffer in the skcipher_request_ctx *before* starting the hardware and copy 
it to req->iv *after* the operation completes.

Regards,
Pascal van Leeuwen
Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Inside Secure
www.insidesecure.com