[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190530203202.GD12310@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 13:32:02 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
Cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] power: supply: Add HWMON compatibility layer
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 01:08:35PM -0700, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 5:40 AM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/29/19 12:11 AM, Andrey Smirnov wrote:
> > > Add code implementing HWMON adapter/compatibility layer to allow
> > > expositing various sensors present on power supply devices via HWMON
> > > subsystem. This is done in order to allow userspace to use single
> > > ABI/library(libsensors) to access/manipulate all of the sensors of the
> > > system.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Chris Healy <cphealy@...il.com>
> > > Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
> > > Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
> > > Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
> > > Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> > > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > > ---
> > > drivers/power/supply/Kconfig | 14 +
> > > drivers/power/supply/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/power/supply/power_supply_hwmon.c | 329 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/power_supply.h | 11 +
> > > 4 files changed, 355 insertions(+)
> > > create mode 100644 drivers/power/supply/power_supply_hwmon.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
> > > index 26dacdab03cc..1f2252cb95fd 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/Kconfig
> > > @@ -14,6 +14,20 @@ config POWER_SUPPLY_DEBUG
> > > Say Y here to enable debugging messages for power supply class
> > > and drivers.
> > >
> > > +config POWER_SUPPLY_HWMON
> > > + bool
> > > + prompt "Expose power supply sensors as hwmon device"
> > > + depends on HWMON=y || HWMON=POWER_SUPPLY
> > > + default y
> >
> > Not sure if you want to enable that by default.
> >
>
> That's what THERMAL_HWMON does which seems pretty analogous to this code.
>
maintainer call to make.
> > > + help
> > > + This options enables API that allows sensors found on a
> > > + power supply device (current, voltage, temperature) to be
> > > + exposed as a hwmon device.
> > > +
> > > + Say 'Y' here if you want power supplies to
> > > + have hwmon sysfs interface too.
> > > +
> > > +
> > > config PDA_POWER
> > > tristate "Generic PDA/phone power driver"
> > > depends on !S390
> > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/Makefile b/drivers/power/supply/Makefile
> > > index f208273f9686..c47e88ba16b9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/power/supply/Makefile
> > > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/Makefile
> > > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ power_supply-$(CONFIG_SYSFS) += power_supply_sysfs.o
> > > power_supply-$(CONFIG_LEDS_TRIGGERS) += power_supply_leds.o
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY) += power_supply.o
> > > +obj-$(CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY_HWMON) += power_supply_hwmon.o
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_GENERIC_ADC_BATTERY) += generic-adc-battery.o
> > >
> > > obj-$(CONFIG_PDA_POWER) += pda_power.o
> > > diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_hwmon.c b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_hwmon.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..dca7f79fae6e
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/power/supply/power_supply_hwmon.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,329 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > +/*
> > > + * power_supply_hwmon.c - power supply hwmon support.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > > +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
> > > +
> > Alphabetic order ?
> >
>
> Sure, will do in v2.
>
> > > +struct power_supply_hwmon {
> > > + struct power_supply *psy;
> > > + unsigned long *props;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static int power_supply_hwmon_in_to_property(u32 attr)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (attr) {
> > > + case hwmon_in_average:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_AVG;
> > > + case hwmon_in_min:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MIN;
> > > + case hwmon_in_max:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MAX;
> > > + case hwmon_in_input:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW;
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int power_supply_hwmon_curr_to_property(u32 attr)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (attr) {
> > > + case hwmon_curr_average:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_AVG;
> > > + case hwmon_curr_max:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX;
> > > + case hwmon_curr_input:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW;
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int power_supply_hwmon_temp_to_property(u32 attr, int channel)
> > > +{
> > > + if (channel) {
> > > + switch (attr) {
> > > + case hwmon_temp_input:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_min_alarm:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT_ALERT_MIN;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_max_alarm:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT_ALERT_MAX;
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + } else {
> > > + switch (attr) {
> > > + case hwmon_temp_input:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_max:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_MAX;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_min:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_MIN;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_min_alarm:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_ALERT_MIN;
> > > + case hwmon_temp_max_alarm:
> > > + return POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_ALERT_MAX;
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +power_supply_hwmon_to_property(enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel)
> > > +{
> > > + switch (type) {
> > > + case hwmon_in:
> > > + return power_supply_hwmon_in_to_property(attr);
> > > + case hwmon_curr:
> > > + return power_supply_hwmon_curr_to_property(attr);
> > > + case hwmon_temp:
> > > + return power_supply_hwmon_temp_to_property(attr, channel);
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static bool power_supply_hwmon_is_a_label(enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr)
> > > +{
> > > + return type == hwmon_temp && attr == hwmon_temp_label;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static umode_t power_supply_hwmon_is_visible(const void *data,
> > > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel)
> > > +{
> > > + const struct power_supply_hwmon *psyhw = data;
> > > + int prop, is_writable;
> > > +
> > > + if (power_supply_hwmon_is_a_label(type, attr))
> > > + return 0444;
> > > +
> > > + prop = power_supply_hwmon_to_property(type, attr, channel);
> > > + if (prop < 0 || !test_bit(prop, psyhw->props))
> > > + return 0;
> > > +
> > > + is_writable = power_supply_property_is_writeable(psyhw->psy, prop);
> > > +
> > > + return (is_writable <= 0) ? 0444 : 0644;
> >
> > I a a bit concerned that this can result in writeable voltage/current/temp
> > values (not just for limits), which would be very undesirable. It might be
> > better to add another check to ensure that this does not happen.
> >
>
> OK, will do.
>
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int power_supply_hwmon_read_string(struct device *dev,
> > > + enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel,
> > > + const char **str)
> > > +{
> > > + *str = channel ? "temp" : "temp ambient";
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +power_supply_hwmon_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> > > +{
> > > + struct power_supply_hwmon *psyhw = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + struct power_supply *psy = psyhw->psy;
> > > + union power_supply_propval pspval;
> > > + int ret, prop;
> > > +
> > > + prop = power_supply_hwmon_to_property(type, attr, channel);
> > > + if (prop < 0)
> > > + return prop;
> > > +
> > > + ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &pspval);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + switch (type) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Both voltage and current is reported in units of
> > > + * microvolts/microamps, so we need to adjust it to
> > > + * milliamps(volts)
> > > + */
> > > + case hwmon_curr:
> > > + case hwmon_in:
> > > + pspval.intval /= 1000;
> >
> > DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST() ?
> >
>
> Yeah, good idea, will do.
>
> > > + break;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Temp needs to be converted from 1/10 C to milli-C
> > > + */
> > > + case hwmon_temp:
> > > + pspval.intval *= 100;
> >
> > intval is an int, so theoretically this could result in an overflow.
> >
>
> Sure, will change the code to use check_mul_overflow()
>
> >
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> >
> > Wouldn't this be an error ?
> >
>
> Shouldn't happen, but adding a error path here won't hurt.
>
> > Personally I prefer direct value assignments. I don't see value in
> > updating pspval.intval first only to assign it to *val later.
> >
>
> This won't work once I convert the code to use check_mul_overflow()
> since it expects its argument to have the same type and "*val" is
> long.
>
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + *val = pspval.intval;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int
> > > +power_supply_hwmon_write(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > > + u32 attr, int channel, long val)
> > > +{
> > > + struct power_supply_hwmon *psyhw = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > + struct power_supply *psy = psyhw->psy;
> > > + union power_supply_propval pspval;
> > > + int prop;
> > > +
> > > + prop = power_supply_hwmon_to_property(type, attr, channel);
> > > + if (prop < 0)
> > > + return prop;
> > > +
> > > + pspval.intval = val;
> > > +
> > > + switch (type) {
> > > + /*
> > > + * Both voltage and current is reported in units of
> > > + * microvolts/microamps, so we need to adjust it to
> > > + * milliamps(volts)
> > > + */
> > > + case hwmon_curr:
> > > + case hwmon_in:
> > > + pspval.intval *= 1000;
> >
> > Range checks ? This can result in an overflow.
> >
>
> Will add check_mul_overflow() here as well.
>
> > > + break;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Temp needs to be converted from 1/10 C to milli-C
> > > + */
> > > + case hwmon_temp:
> > > + pspval.intval /= 100;
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> >
> > Wouldn't this be an error ?
> >
>
> Will add an error path in v2.
>
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return power_supply_set_property(psy, prop, &pspval);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static const struct hwmon_ops power_supply_hwmon_ops = {
> > > + .is_visible = power_supply_hwmon_is_visible,
> > > + .read = power_supply_hwmon_read,
> > > + .write = power_supply_hwmon_write,
> > > + .read_string = power_supply_hwmon_read_string,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct hwmon_channel_info *power_supply_hwmon_info[] = {
> > > + HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(temp,
> > > + HWMON_T_LABEL |
> > > + HWMON_T_INPUT |
> > > + HWMON_T_MAX |
> > > + HWMON_T_MIN |
> > > + HWMON_T_MIN_ALARM |
> > > + HWMON_T_MIN_ALARM,
> > > +
> > > + HWMON_T_LABEL |
> > > + HWMON_T_INPUT |
> > > + HWMON_T_MIN_ALARM |
> > > + HWMON_T_LABEL |
> > > + HWMON_T_MAX_ALARM),
> > > +
> > > + HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(curr,
> > > + HWMON_C_AVERAGE |
> > > + HWMON_C_MAX |
> > > + HWMON_C_INPUT),
> > > +
> > > + HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(in,
> > > + HWMON_I_AVERAGE |
> > > + HWMON_I_MIN |
> > > + HWMON_I_MAX |
> > > + HWMON_I_INPUT),
> > > + NULL
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static const struct hwmon_chip_info power_supply_hwmon_chip_info = {
> > > + .ops = &power_supply_hwmon_ops,
> > > + .info = power_supply_hwmon_info,
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +static void power_supply_hwmon_bitmap_free(void *data)
> > > +{
> > > + bitmap_free(data);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +struct device *devm_power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs(struct power_supply *psy)
> > > +{
> > > + const struct power_supply_desc *desc = psy->desc;
> > > + struct power_supply_hwmon *psyhw;
> > > + struct device *dev = &psy->dev;
> > > + struct device *hwmon;
> > > + int ret, i;
> > > +
> > > + if (!devres_open_group(dev, NULL, GFP_KERNEL))
> > > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > > +
> > > + psyhw = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*psyhw), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!psyhw) {
> > > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > + goto error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + psyhw->psy = psy;
> > > + psyhw->props = bitmap_zalloc(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TIME_TO_FULL_AVG + 1,
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!psyhw->props) {
> > > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > + goto error;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = devm_add_action(dev, power_supply_hwmon_bitmap_free,
> > > + psyhw->props);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto error;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < desc->num_properties; i++) {
> > > + const enum power_supply_property prop = desc->properties[i];
> > > +
> > > + switch (prop) {
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_AVG:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_MAX:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CURRENT_NOW:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_MAX:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_MIN:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_ALERT_MIN:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_ALERT_MAX:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT_ALERT_MIN:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_TEMP_AMBIENT_ALERT_MAX:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_AVG:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MIN:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_MAX:
> > > + case POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_VOLTAGE_NOW:
> > > + set_bit(prop, psyhw->props);
> > > + break;
> > > + default:
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + hwmon = devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, psy->desc->name,
> > > + psyhw,
> > > + &power_supply_hwmon_chip_info,
> > > + NULL);
> > > + ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hwmon);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + goto error;
> > > +
> > > + devres_remove_group(dev, NULL);
> >
> > Why devres_remove_group() and not devres_close_group() ?
> >
>
> That's id-less group that'll never be used again, closing it and
> keeping it around isn't really particularly useful to me.
>
Ok, fine with me if it works. I have no idea what the semantics of devres
groups is, much less what the difference between devres_remove_group() and
devres_close_group() is.
> > > + return hwmon;
> >
> > Why return a pointer to the hwmon device and not just an error code ?
> >
>
> Just to expose created hwmon device.
>
Sure, but what for ?
> > > +error:
> > > + devres_release_group(dev, NULL);
> > > + return ERR_PTR(ret);
> > > +}
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/power_supply.h b/include/linux/power_supply.h
> > > index d9c0c094f8a0..839abfa2c640 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/power_supply.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/power_supply.h
> > > @@ -481,4 +481,15 @@ static inline bool power_supply_is_watt_property(enum power_supply_property psp)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_POWER_SUPPLY_HWMON
> > > +extern struct device *
> > > +devm_power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs(struct power_supply *psy);
> > > +#else
> > > +static struct device *
> > > +devm_power_supply_add_hwmon_sysfs(struct power_supply *psy)
> > > +{
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > You might consider making the return code an int. Otherwise this gets difficult
> > for the caller, who would have to check for IS_ERR() and NULL (if the device
> > pointer is supposed to be used for anything).
> >
>
> Sure, if removing access to created hwmon device is OK, I am more than
> happy to convert this to return an int.
>
Again, the question is the opposite: You should not return a pointer unless
you have a use case. "to expose created hwmon device" is not a use case.
Thanks,
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists