linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: bpf maps memory accounting cleanup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAADnVQKCYDdP2xvmV4P38Ewh5YgyPnT-EV10oWrUpeCCJBrqcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 31 May 2019 17:00:56 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf: bpf maps memory accounting cleanup

On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 6:04 PM Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> wrote:
>
> During my work on memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps
> I've done some cleanups and refactorings of the existing
> memlock rlimit-based code. It makes it more robust, unifies
> size to pages conversion, size checks and corresponding error
> codes. Also it adds coverage for cgroup local storage and
> socket local storage maps.
>
> It looks like some preliminary work on the mm side might be
> required to start working on the memcg-based accounting,
> so I'm sending these patches as a separate patchset.

Applied. Thanks