lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VE1PR04MB6687FF805430978ED307EA2D8F140@VE1PR04MB6687.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jun 2019 19:55:51 +0000
From:   Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@...vas.se>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>
CC:     "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Scott Wood <oss@...error.net>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "jocke@...inera.com" <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc/fsl/qe: cleanups and new DT binding



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rasmus Villemoes <Rasmus.Villemoes@...vas.se>
> Sent: Monday, June 3, 2019 2:54 PM
> To: devicetree@...r.kernel.org; Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>; Leo Li
> <leoyang.li@....com>
> Cc: linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>; Scott
> Wood <oss@...error.net>; Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>;
> Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; jocke@...inera.com
> <joakim.tjernlund@...inera.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] soc/fsl/qe: cleanups and new DT binding
> 
> On 13/05/2019 13.14, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This small series consists of some small cleanups and simplifications
> > of the QUICC engine driver, and introduces a new DT binding that makes
> > it much easier to support other variants of the QUICC engine IP block
> > that appears in the wild: There's no reason to expect in general that
> > the number of valid SNUMs uniquely determines the set of such, so it's
> > better to simply let the device tree specify the values (and,
> > implicitly via the array length, also the count).
> >
> > Which tree should this go through?
> 
> Ping? These patches should be ready to go in, but I don't know who is
> supposed to pick them up.

I can pick them up through the soc/fsl tree.

Regards,
Leo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ