[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190604091416.GI3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:14:16 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 15/19] locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader
optimistic spinning
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:59:14PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On a 2-socket 40-core 80-thread Skylake system, the page_fault1 test of
> the will-it-scale benchmark was run with various number of threads. The
> number of operations done before reader optimistic spinning patches,
> this patch and after this patch were:
>
> Threads Before rspin Before patch After patch %change
> ------- ------------ ------------ ----------- -------
> 20 5541068 5345484 5455667 -3.5%/ +2.1%
> 40 10185150 7292313 9219276 -28.5%/+26.4%
> 60 8196733 6460517 7181209 -21.2%/+11.2%
> 80 9508864 6739559 8107025 -29.1%/+20.3%
'rspin' is patch 12 in this series, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists