[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190604092008.GJ3402@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 11:20:08 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 15/19] locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader
optimistic spinning
On Mon, May 20, 2019 at 04:59:14PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> @@ -286,6 +325,7 @@ struct rwsem_waiter {
> struct task_struct *task;
> enum rwsem_waiter_type type;
> unsigned long timeout;
> + long last_rowner;
> };
> #define rwsem_first_waiter(sem) \
> list_first_entry(&sem->wait_list, struct rwsem_waiter, list)
> +static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + long last_rowner)
> +static inline bool rwsem_reader_phase_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem,
> + unsigned long last_rowner)
> + waiter.last_rowner = atomic_long_read(&sem->owner);
That's somewhat inconsistent wrt the type. I'll make it unsigned long,
as that is what makes most sense, given there's a pointer inside.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists