lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190604144728.GA18051@hao-dev>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jun 2019 22:47:28 +0800
From:   Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     atull@...nel.org, mdf@...nel.org, linux-fpga@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@...el.com>,
        Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 16/16] fpga: dfl: fme: add performance reporting
 support

On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 02:42:19AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 05:11:47PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:03:05PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 01:22:26PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-fme-perf.c
> > > > @@ -0,0 +1,962 @@
> > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Driver for FPGA Management Engine (FME) Global Performance Reporting
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Copyright 2019 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Authors:
> > > > + *   Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@...el.com>
> > > > + *   Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@...ux.intel.com>
> > > > + *   Wu Hao <hao.wu@...el.com>
> > > > + *   Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@...el.com>
> > > > + *   Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@...el.com>
> > > > + *   Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@...el.com>
> > > > + *   Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@...el.com>
> > > > + *   Mitchel, Henry <henry.mitchel@...el.com>
> > > > + */
> > > > +
> > > > +#include "dfl.h"
> > > > +#include "dfl-fme.h"
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Performance Counter Registers for Cache.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Cache Events are listed below as CACHE_EVNT_*.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define CACHE_CTRL			0x8
> > > > +#define CACHE_RESET_CNTR		BIT_ULL(0)
> > > > +#define CACHE_FREEZE_CNTR		BIT_ULL(8)
> > > > +#define CACHE_CTRL_EVNT			GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_RD_HIT		0x0
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_WR_HIT		0x1
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_RD_MISS		0x2
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_WR_MISS		0x3
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_RSVD			0x4
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_HOLD_REQ		0x5
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_DATA_WR_PORT_CONTEN	0x6
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_TAG_WR_PORT_CONTEN	0x7
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_TX_REQ_STALL		0x8
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_RX_REQ_STALL		0x9
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_EVICTIONS		0xa
> > > > +#define CACHE_EVNT_MAX			CACHE_EVNT_EVICTIONS
> > > > +#define CACHE_CHANNEL_SEL		BIT_ULL(20)
> > > > +#define CACHE_CHANNEL_RD		0
> > > > +#define CACHE_CHANNEL_WR		1
> > > > +#define CACHE_CHANNEL_MAX		2
> > > > +#define CACHE_CNTR0			0x10
> > > > +#define CACHE_CNTR1			0x18
> > > > +#define CACHE_CNTR_EVNT_CNTR		GENMASK_ULL(47, 0)
> > > > +#define CACHE_CNTR_EVNT			GENMASK_ULL(63, 60)
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Performance Counter Registers for Fabric.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Fabric Events are listed below as FAB_EVNT_*
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define FAB_CTRL			0x20
> > > > +#define FAB_RESET_CNTR			BIT_ULL(0)
> > > > +#define FAB_FREEZE_CNTR			BIT_ULL(8)
> > > > +#define FAB_CTRL_EVNT			GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_PCIE0_RD		0x0
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_PCIE0_WR		0x1
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_PCIE1_RD		0x2
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_PCIE1_WR		0x3
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_UPI_RD			0x4
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_UPI_WR			0x5
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_MMIO_RD		0x6
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_MMIO_WR		0x7
> > > > +#define FAB_EVNT_MAX			FAB_EVNT_MMIO_WR
> > > > +#define FAB_PORT_ID			GENMASK_ULL(21, 20)
> > > > +#define FAB_PORT_FILTER			BIT_ULL(23)
> > > > +#define FAB_PORT_FILTER_DISABLE		0
> > > > +#define FAB_PORT_FILTER_ENABLE		1
> > > > +#define FAB_CNTR			0x28
> > > > +#define FAB_CNTR_EVNT_CNTR		GENMASK_ULL(59, 0)
> > > > +#define FAB_CNTR_EVNT			GENMASK_ULL(63, 60)
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Performance Counter Registers for Clock.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * Clock Counter can't be reset or frozen by SW.
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define CLK_CNTR			0x30
> > > > +
> > > > +/*
> > > > + * Performance Counter Registers for IOMMU / VT-D.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * VT-D Events are listed below as VTD_EVNT_* and VTD_SIP_EVNT_*
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define VTD_CTRL			0x38
> > > > +#define VTD_RESET_CNTR			BIT_ULL(0)
> > > > +#define VTD_FREEZE_CNTR			BIT_ULL(8)
> > > > +#define VTD_CTRL_EVNT			GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_AFU_MEM_RD_TRANS	0x0
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_AFU_MEM_WR_TRANS	0x1
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_AFU_DEVTLB_RD_HIT	0x2
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_AFU_DEVTLB_WR_HIT	0x3
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_DEVTLB_4K_FILL		0x4
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_DEVTLB_2M_FILL		0x5
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_DEVTLB_1G_FILL		0x6
> > > > +#define VTD_EVNT_MAX			VTD_EVNT_DEVTLB_1G_FILL
> > > > +#define VTD_CNTR			0x40
> > > > +#define VTD_CNTR_EVNT			GENMASK_ULL(63, 60)
> > > > +#define VTD_CNTR_EVNT_CNTR		GENMASK_ULL(47, 0)
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_CTRL			0x48
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_RESET_CNTR		BIT_ULL(0)
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_FREEZE_CNTR		BIT_ULL(8)
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_CTRL_EVNT		GENMASK_ULL(19, 16)
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_IOTLB_4K_HIT	0x0
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_IOTLB_2M_HIT	0x1
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_IOTLB_1G_HIT	0x2
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_SLPWC_L3_HIT	0x3
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_SLPWC_L4_HIT	0x4
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_RCC_HIT		0x5
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_IOTLB_4K_MISS	0x6
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_IOTLB_2M_MISS	0x7
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_IOTLB_1G_MISS	0x8
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_SLPWC_L3_MISS	0x9
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_SLPWC_L4_MISS	0xa
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_RCC_MISS		0xb
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_EVNT_MAX		VTD_SIP_EVNT_RCC_MISS
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_CNTR			0X50
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_CNTR_EVNT		GENMASK_ULL(63, 60)
> > > > +#define VTD_SIP_CNTR_EVNT_CNTR		GENMASK_ULL(47, 0)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define PERF_OBJ_ROOT_ID		(~0)
> > > > +
> > > > +#define PERF_TIMEOUT			30
> > > > +
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * struct perf_object - object of performance counter
> > > > + *
> > > > + * @id: instance id. PERF_OBJ_ROOT_ID indicates it is a parent object which
> > > > + *      counts performance counters for all instances.
> > > > + * @attr_groups: the sysfs files are associated with this object.
> > > > + * @feature: pointer to related private feature.
> > > > + * @node: used to link itself to parent's children list.
> > > > + * @children: used to link its children objects together.
> > > > + * @kobj: generic kobject interface.
> > > > + *
> > > > + * 'node' and 'children' are used to construct parent-children hierarchy.
> > > > + */
> > > > +struct perf_object {
> > > > +	int id;
> > > > +	const struct attribute_group **attr_groups;
> > > > +	struct dfl_feature *feature;
> > > > +
> > > > +	struct list_head node;
> > > > +	struct list_head children;
> > > > +	struct kobject kobj;
> > > 
> > > Woah, why are you using a "raw" kobject and not a 'struct device' here?
> > > You just broke userspace and no libraries will see your kobject's
> > > properties as the "chain" of struct devices is not happening anymore.
> > > 
> > > Why can this not just be a 'struct device'?
> > 
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > Many thanks for the review and comments.
> > 
> > Actually we are just trying to create sysfs hierarchy for performance
> > counters using these data structures.
> > 
> > If we use 'struct device' instead of kobject, then we have to let userspace
> > code to deal with device's sysfs (e.g. ignore 'uevent' below). This is the
> > only concern from my side now, as I know that using 'struct device'
> > saves code as we don't need to introduce a new perf_obj_attribute then.
> > 
> > dfl-fme.0/perf/
> >  ├── iommu
> >  │   ├── afu0
> >  │   │   ├── devtlb_1g_fill
> >  │   │   ├── devtlb_2m_fill
> >  │   │   ├── devtlb_4k_fill
> >  │   │   ├── devtlb_read_hit
> >  │   │   ├── devtlb_write_hit
> >  │   │   ├── read_transaction
> >  │   │   ├── uevent
> >  │   │   └── write_transaction
> >  │   ├── freeze
> >  │   ├── iotlb_1g_hit
> >  │   ├── iotlb_1g_miss
> > 	 ...
> >      └── uevent
> >  ...
> > 
> > Do you think if we could keep it or it's better to use 'struct device'?
> 
> What about using the attribute group name?  That gives you a subdir for
> free.  Doing anything "deeper" than one level means that you really have
> a child device, and yes, you need to use a 'struct device'.  Make it
> part of your bus and just have it be a different "type" and all should
> be good.
> 
> Again, NEVER use a raw kobject as a child of a 'struct device', that
> will break things.
> 
> And please cc: me on this series from now on, as you are obviously
> trying to do complex things with the driver model and sysfs and it is
> easy to get very wrong.
> 
> But wait, step back, why does this one driver have such a "special"
> user/kernel api that unique to it and nothing else?  That's also a big
> red flag, why not just use the normal perf api that everyone else uses?
>

Hi Greg,

Actually we just tried to add some interfaces for users to read hardware
counters, Yes, I fully agree that we should use the existing apis whenever
possible. I will look into perf api to see if we can use them instead.

Many thanks for the review and comments!

Hao

> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ