[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605061238.GC29853@dragon>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 14:12:40 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
Cc: "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"wim@...ux-watchdog.org" <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
"linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"ulf.hansson@...aro.org" <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org" <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V4 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Move watchdog node
into scu node
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 06:09:12AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> Hi, Shawn
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2019 2:00 PM
> > To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
> > Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org; mark.rutland@....com; wim@...ux-watchdog.org;
> > linux@...ck-us.net; s.hauer@...gutronix.de; kernel@...gutronix.de;
> > festevam@...il.com; Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>;
> > ulf.hansson@...aro.org; Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>; Peng Fan
> > <peng.fan@....com>; devicetree@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> > kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > kernel@...ts.infradead.org; dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND V4 2/3] arm64: dts: imx8qxp: Move watchdog
> > node into scu node
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 09:06:28AM +0000, Anson Huang wrote:
> > > Hi, Shawn
> > > The driver and binding doc are already reviewed and waiting for DT
> > patch, will you help review this DT patch?
> >
> > I'm fine with it. Should I just pick this patch up, or is there any dependency
> > we need to handle?
>
> No dependency, it just makes more sense to move the node into SCU node as it is NOW depending on SCU
> driver. Once you pick up this patch
Just applied.
> (and maybe the dt-binding patch as well?),
It makes more sense to have it go through watchdog tree.
Shawn
> I will notify the watchdog
> maintainer to pick up the watchdog patch in this series.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists