[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605140539.GA11331@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:06:01 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, corbet@....net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...rosoft.com,
thiruan@...rosoft.com, bryankel@...rosoft.com,
tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE
On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 05:16:48PM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2019 at 11:28:15PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 11:27:56AM -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > > Changes since v3:
> > >
> > > - Address comments by Jarkko Sakkinen
> > > - Address comments by Igor Opaniuk
> > >
> > > Sasha Levin (2):
> > > fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE
> > > fTPM: add documentation for ftpm driver
> >
> > I think patches start to look proper but I wonder can anyone test
> > these? I don't think before that I can merge these.
>
> They're all functionally tested by us on actual hardware before being
> sent out.
>
> The reference implementation is open and being kept updated, and an
> interested third party should be able to verify the correctness of these
> patches. However, it doesn't look like there's an interested third party
> given that these patches have been out for a few months now.
So can they be tagged with your tested-by?
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists