[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605140848.GB11331@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:09:31 +0300
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca,
corbet@....net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Microsoft Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@...rosoft.com>,
Thirupathaiah Annapureddy <thiruan@...rosoft.com>,
"Bryan Kelly (CSI)" <bryankel@...rosoft.com>,
tee-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] fTPM: firmware TPM running in TEE
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 11:45:52AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Is this well tested? I see this misleading error multiple times as
> follows although TEE driver works pretty well.
>
> Module built with "CONFIG_TCG_FTPM_TEE=y"
>
> [ 1.436878] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
> [ 1.509471] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
> [ 1.517268] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
> [ 1.525596] ftpm-tee tpm@0: ftpm_tee_probe:tee_client_open_context failed
>
> -Sumit
No testing done from my part.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists