[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190605165400.GF50849@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 17:54:00 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, jdike@...toit.com,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@....com>, Bin Lu <bin.lu@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] ptrace: cleanup PTRACE_SYSEMU handling and add
support for arm64
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 10:06:14AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> Sudeep Holla (4):
> ptrace: move clearing of TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flag to core
> x86: simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling
> arm64: add PTRACE_SYSEMU{,SINGLESTEP} definations to uapi headers
> arm64: ptrace: add support for syscall emulation
I queued patches 1, 3 and 4 through the arm64 tree. There is no
dependency on patch 2 (just general clean-)up; happy to take it as well
or it can go in via the x86 tree.
Thanks.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists