[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906111633400.1662@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:38:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, jdike@...toit.com,
Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@....com>,
Haibo Xu <haibo.xu@....com>, Bin Lu <bin.lu@....com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] x86: simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling
On Thu, 23 May 2019, Sudeep Holla wrote:
$Subject: Please use the proper prefix and start the sentence with an upper
case letter.
x86/entry: Simplify _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU handling
> The usage of emulated/_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU flags in syscall_trace_enter
> seems to be bit overcomplicated than required. Let's simplify it.
s/seems to be bit overcomplicated/is more complicated/
Either you are sure that it is overengineered, then say so. If not, then
you should not touch the code at all.
s/Let's simplify it.//
'Let's do X.' is a popular, but technically useless phrase.
> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
This is a nice simplification indeed! With the changelog fixed:
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists