[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2019 18:00:02 +0900
From: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
To: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ocxl: do not use C++ style comments in uapi header
Hi Michael,
On Wed, Jun 5, 2019 at 3:18 PM Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/6/19 10:12 pm, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 8:54 PM Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 04/06/2019 à 13:16, Masahiro Yamada a écrit :
> >>> Linux kernel tolerates C++ style comments these days. Actually, the
> >>> SPDX License tags for .c files start with //.
> >>>
> >>> On the other hand, uapi headers are written in more strict C, where
> >>> the C++ comment style is forbidden.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>
> >>> ---
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> >> Acked-by: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
> >>
> >
> > Please hold on this patch until
> > we get consensus about the C++ comment style.
> >
> > Discussion just started here:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1083801/
>
> If you choose to proceed with this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>
After some discussion,
the other one was applied to the media subsystem.
Please pick up this one with Frederic and Andrew's Ack.
Thanks.
--
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada
Powered by blists - more mailing lists