[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a51622f-7bd8-2c6c-b3c5-8b87c2b5be0c@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2019 17:26:32 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
thierry.reding@...il.com, jonathanh@...dia.com, kishon@...com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will.deacon@....com, jingoohan1@...il.com,
gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com
Cc: mperttunen@...dia.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kthota@...dia.com, mmaddireddy@...dia.com, sagar.tv@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 14/15] PCI: tegra: Add Tegra194 PCIe support
07.06.2019 17:10, Vidya Sagar пишет:
> On 6/7/2019 12:22 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 06.06.2019 19:35, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
>>> 26.05.2019 7:37, Vidya Sagar пишет:
>>>> Add support for Synopsys DesignWare core IP based PCIe host controller
>>>> present in Tegra194 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@...dia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Changes since [v7]:
>>>> * Addressed review comments from Thierry
>>>>
>>>> Changes since [v6]:
>>>> * Removed code around "nvidia,disable-aspm-states" DT property
>>>> * Refactored code to remove code duplication
>>>>
>>>> Changes since [v5]:
>>>> * Addressed review comments from Thierry
>>>>
>>>> Changes since [v4]:
>>>> * None
>>>>
>>>> Changes since [v3]:
>>>> * None
>>>>
>>>> Changes since [v2]:
>>>> * Changed 'nvidia,init-speed' to 'nvidia,init-link-speed'
>>>> * Changed 'nvidia,pex-wake' to 'nvidia,wake-gpios'
>>>> * Removed .runtime_suspend() & .runtime_resume() implementations
>>>>
>>>> Changes since [v1]:
>>>> * Made CONFIG_PCIE_TEGRA194 as 'm' by default from its previous 'y'
>>>> state
>>>> * Modified code as per changes made to DT documentation
>>>> * Refactored code to address Bjorn & Thierry's review comments
>>>> * Added goto to avoid recursion in tegra_pcie_dw_host_init() API
>>>> * Merged .scan_bus() of dw_pcie_host_ops implementation to
>>>> tegra_pcie_dw_host_init() API
>>>>
>>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig | 10 +
>>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c | 1621
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 3 files changed, 1632 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-tegra194.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
>>>> b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
>>>> index a6ce1ee51b4c..884112afc11b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -220,6 +220,16 @@ config PCI_MESON
>>>> and therefore the driver re-uses the DesignWare core
>>>> functions to
>>>> implement the driver.
>>>> +config PCIE_TEGRA194
>>>> + tristate "NVIDIA Tegra194 (and later) PCIe controller"
>>>> + depends on (TEGRA_BPMP && ARCH_TEGRA) || COMPILE_TEST
>>>
>>> TEGRA_BPMP will be enough here as it depends on other relevant options.
>>>
>>> Hence I mean:
>>>
>>> depends on TEGRA_BPMP || COMPILE_TEST
>>
>> Maybe it's worth to even change TEGRA_BPMP to ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC.
>> Although then you'll have to extend it with other platforms later on,
>> but probably that's fine.
> I received an explicit comment previously to make this dependent on
> TEGRA_BPMP
> as the driver is using APIs to get certain jobs done by BPMP-FW. But, since
> we can't boot kernel in the first place without having BPMP-FW in place,
> I think
> it should be fine to make it dependent on ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC directly.
ARCH_TEGRA_194_SOC selects BPMP by itself (see
drivers/soc/tegra/Kconfig), so it's indeed absolutely fine.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists