linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/15] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190607232742.d331359f0d511c78d06e1703@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jun 2019 23:27:42 +0900
From:   Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
        David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate
 instructions

On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 10:20:13 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 05:41:42AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> 
> > > int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > {
> > > +	long ip = regs->ip - INT3_INSN_SIZE + CALL_INSN_SIZE;
> > > +	struct opcode {
> > > +		u8 insn;
> > > +		s32 rel;
> > > +	} __packed opcode;
> > > +
> > > 	/*
> > > 	 * Having observed our INT3 instruction, we now must observe
> > > 	 * bp_patching_in_progress.
> > > 	 *
> > > -	 * 	in_progress = TRUE		INT3
> > > -	 * 	WMB				RMB
> > > -	 * 	write INT3			if (in_progress)
> > > +	 *	in_progress = TRUE		INT3
> > > +	 *	WMB				RMB
> > > +	 *	write INT3			if (in_progress)
> > 
> > I don’t see what has changed in this chunk… Whitespaces?
> 
> Yep, my editor kept marking that stuff red (space before tab), which
> annoyed me enough to fix it.
> 
> > > 	 *
> > > -	 * Idem for bp_int3_handler.
> > > +	 * Idem for bp_int3_opcode.
> > > 	 */
> > > 	smp_rmb();
> > > 
> > > @@ -943,8 +949,21 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *re
> > > 	if (user_mode(regs) || regs->ip != (unsigned long)bp_int3_addr)
> > > 		return 0;
> > > 
> > > -	/* set up the specified breakpoint handler */
> > > -	regs->ip = (unsigned long) bp_int3_handler;
> > > +	opcode = *(struct opcode *)bp_int3_opcode;
> > > +
> > > +	switch (opcode.insn) {
> > > +	case 0xE8: /* CALL */
> > > +		int3_emulate_call(regs, ip + opcode.rel);
> > > +		break;
> > > +
> > > +	case 0xE9: /* JMP */
> > > +		int3_emulate_jmp(regs, ip + opcode.rel);
> > > +		break;
> > 
> > Consider using RELATIVECALL_OPCODE and RELATIVEJUMP_OPCODE instead of the
> > constants (0xE8, 0xE9), just as you do later in the patch.
> 
> Those are private to kprobes..
> 
> but I can do something like so:
> 
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
> @@ -48,8 +48,14 @@ static inline void int3_emulate_jmp(stru
>  	regs->ip = ip;
>  }
>  
> -#define INT3_INSN_SIZE 1
> -#define CALL_INSN_SIZE 5
> +#define INT3_INSN_SIZE		1
> +#define INT3_INSN_OPCODE	0xCC
> +
> +#define CALL_INSN_SIZE		5
> +#define CALL_INSN_OPCODE	0xE8
> +
> +#define JMP_INSN_SIZE		5
> +#define JMP_INSN_OPCODE		0xE9
>  
>  static inline void int3_emulate_push(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long val)
>  {
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -952,11 +952,11 @@ int poke_int3_handler(struct pt_regs *re
>  	opcode = *(struct opcode *)bp_int3_opcode;
>  
>  	switch (opcode.insn) {
> -	case 0xE8: /* CALL */
> +	case CALL_INSN_OPCODE:
>  		int3_emulate_call(regs, ip + opcode.rel);
>  		break;
>  
> -	case 0xE9: /* JMP */
> +	case JMP_INSN_OPCODE:
>  		int3_emulate_jmp(regs, ip + opcode.rel);
>  		break;
>  

This looks good. I don't want to make those opcode as private.
I would like to share it.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>