[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190609074930.GA25109@infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 00:49:30 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, lollivier@...libre.com,
paul@...an.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aou@...s.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] arch: riscv: add support for building DTB files
from DT source data
On Sat, Jun 08, 2019 at 10:50:14PM -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Once there are SoC variants that have different CPU cores, but with the
> remaining chip integration the same, I think it would make sense to move
> the CONFIG_SOC_ stuff out from ARM, RISC-V, etc., into something that's
> not CPU architecture-specific. But for the time being, that seems
> premature. Might as well have it be driven by an actual use-case.
We've already had a few SOC families with the same periphals glue and
either m68k/powerpc, powerpc/mips or mips/arm/arm64 CPUs, so this isn't
exactly new. Not really sure the grouping adds that much value, though.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists