linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29ef33a9-f1f1-fe10-9288-8103714d40fa@suse.de>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 15:36:42 +0200
From:   Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
        sboyd@...nel.org
Cc:     ulf.hansson@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        thomas.liau@...ions-semi.com, linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] clk: actions: Fix factor clk struct member access

Hi Mani,

Am 08.06.19 um 21:53 schrieb Manivannan Sadhasivam:
> Since the helper "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" is shared between factor
> and composite clocks, using the factor clk specific helper function
> like "hw_to_owl_factor" to access its members will create issues when
> called from composite clk specific code. Hence, pass the "factor_hw"
> struct pointer directly instead of fetching it using factor clk specific
> helpers.
> 
> This issue has been observed when a composite clock like "sd0_clk" tried
> to call "owl_factor_helper_round_rate" resulting in pointer dereferencing
> error.
> 
> Fixes: 4bb78fc9744a ("clk: actions: Add factor clock support")
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c | 7 +++----
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c
> index 317d4a9e112e..f419dfdd334f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/actions/owl-factor.c
> @@ -64,11 +64,10 @@ static unsigned int _get_table_val(const struct clk_factor_table *table,
>  	return val;
>  }
>  
> -static int clk_val_best(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> +static int clk_val_best(const struct owl_factor_hw *factor_hw,
> +			struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>  			unsigned long *best_parent_rate)
>  {
> -	struct owl_factor *factor = hw_to_owl_factor(hw);
> -	struct owl_factor_hw *factor_hw = &factor->factor_hw;
>  	const struct clk_factor_table *clkt = factor_hw->table;
>  	unsigned long parent_rate, try_parent_rate, best = 0, cur_rate;
>  	unsigned long parent_rate_saved = *best_parent_rate;
> @@ -126,7 +125,7 @@ long owl_factor_helper_round_rate(struct owl_clk_common *common,
>  	const struct clk_factor_table *clkt = factor_hw->table;
>  	unsigned int val, mul = 0, div = 1;
>  
> -	val = clk_val_best(&common->hw, rate, parent_rate);
> +	val = clk_val_best(factor_hw, &common->hw, rate, parent_rate);
>  	_get_table_div_mul(clkt, val, &mul, &div);
>  
>  	return *parent_rate * mul / div;

While at it, I think it would be a good idea to rename it to
owl_clk_val_best. Pretty confusing that you're touching only owl files
for a clk_ refactoring, which sounds like common clk code.

Regards,
Andreas

-- 
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)