lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 11:52:06 -0700
From:   Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+4d497898effeb1936245@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>, mwb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next boot error: WARNING: workqueue cpumask: online
 intersect > possible intersect

Hello,

On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 10:45:45AM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> +workqueue maintainers and Michael who added this WARNING
> 
> The WARNING was added in 2017, so I guess it's a change somewhere else
> that triggered it.
> The WARNING message does not seem to give enough info about the caller
> (should it be changed to WARN_ONCE to print a stack?). How can be root
> cause this and unbreak linux-next?

So, during boot, workqueue builds masks of possible cpus of each node
and stores them on wq_numa_possible_cpumask[] array.  The warning is
saying that somehow online cpumask of a node became a superset of the
possible mask, which should never happen.

Dumping all masks in wq_numa_possible_cpumasks[] and cpumask_of_node()
of each node should show what's going on.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ