linux-kernel - Re: memory leak in start_sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Jun 2019 22:52:54 +0300 (EEST)
From:   Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
cc:     syzbot <syzbot+7e2e50c8adfccd2e5041@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        coreteam@...filter.org, davem@...emloft.net, fw@...len.de,
        horms@...ge.net.au, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        pablo@...filter.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        wensong@...ux-vs.org
Subject: Re: memory leak in start_sync_thread


	Hello,

On Mon, 10 Jun 2019, Eric Biggers wrote:

> On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:28:05AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > syzbot found the following crash on:
> > 
> > HEAD commit:    cd6c84d8 Linux 5.2-rc2
> > git tree:       upstream
> > console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=132bd44aa00000
> > kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=64479170dcaf0e11
> > dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7e2e50c8adfccd2e5041
> > compiler:       gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> > syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=114b1354a00000
> > C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=14b7ad26a00000
> > 
> > IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> > Reported-by: syzbot+7e2e50c8adfccd2e5041@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > 
> > d started: state = MASTER, mcast_ifn = syz_tun, syncid = 0, id = 0
> > BUG: memory leak
> > unreferenced object 0xffff8881206bf700 (size 32):
> >   comm "syz-executor761", pid 7268, jiffies 4294943441 (age 20.470s)
> >   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> >     00 40 7c 09 81 88 ff ff 80 45 b8 21 81 88 ff ff  .@.......E.!....
> >     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
> >   backtrace:
> >     [<0000000057619e23>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive
> > include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
> >     [<0000000057619e23>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
> >     [<0000000057619e23>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
> >     [<0000000057619e23>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x13d/0x280 mm/slab.c:3553
> >     [<0000000086ce5479>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
> >     [<0000000086ce5479>] start_sync_thread+0x5d2/0xe10
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1862
> >     [<000000001a9229cc>] do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x4c5/0x780
> > net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2402
> >     [<00000000ece457c8>] nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline]
> >     [<00000000ece457c8>] nf_setsockopt+0x4c/0x80
> > net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115
> >     [<00000000942f62d4>] ip_setsockopt net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1258 [inline]
> >     [<00000000942f62d4>] ip_setsockopt+0x9b/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1238
> >     [<00000000a56a8ffd>] udp_setsockopt+0x4e/0x90 net/ipv4/udp.c:2616
> >     [<00000000fa895401>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x38/0x50
> > net/core/sock.c:3130
> >     [<0000000095eef4cf>] __sys_setsockopt+0x98/0x120 net/socket.c:2078
> >     [<000000009747cf88>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2089 [inline]
> >     [<000000009747cf88>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2086 [inline]
> >     [<000000009747cf88>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x26/0x30 net/socket.c:2086
> >     [<00000000ded8ba80>] do_syscall_64+0x76/0x1a0
> > arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
> >     [<00000000893b4ac8>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> > 
> 
> The bug is that ownership of some memory is passed to a kthread started by
> kthread_run(), but the kthread can be stopped before it actually executes the
> threadfn.  See the code in kernel/kthread.c:
> 
>         ret = -EINTR;
>         if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) {
>                 cgroup_kthread_ready();
>                 __kthread_parkme(self);
>                 ret = threadfn(data);
>         }
> 
> So, apparently the thread parameters must always be owned by the owner of the
> kthread, not by the kthread itself.  It seems like this would be a common
> mistake in kernel code; I'm surprised this doesn't come up more...

	Thanks! It explains the problem. It was not obvious from the
fact that only tinfo was reported as a leak, nothing for tinfo->sock.

	Moving sock_release to owner complicates the locking but
I'll try to fix it in the following days...

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>