linux-kernel - Re: memory leak in start_sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190611010612.GD220379@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jun 2019 18:06:13 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     syzbot <syzbot+7e2e50c8adfccd2e5041@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc:     coreteam@...filter.org, davem@...emloft.net, fw@...len.de,
        horms@...ge.net.au, ja@....bg, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        pablo@...filter.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        wensong@...ux-vs.org
Subject: Re: memory leak in start_sync_thread

On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 11:28:05AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> syzbot found the following crash on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    cd6c84d8 Linux 5.2-rc2
> git tree:       upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=132bd44aa00000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=64479170dcaf0e11
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=7e2e50c8adfccd2e5041
> compiler:       gcc (GCC) 9.0.0 20181231 (experimental)
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=114b1354a00000
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=14b7ad26a00000
> 
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+7e2e50c8adfccd2e5041@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> 
> d started: state = MASTER, mcast_ifn = syz_tun, syncid = 0, id = 0
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff8881206bf700 (size 32):
>   comm "syz-executor761", pid 7268, jiffies 4294943441 (age 20.470s)
>   hex dump (first 32 bytes):
>     00 40 7c 09 81 88 ff ff 80 45 b8 21 81 88 ff ff  .@.......E.!....
>     00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00  ................
>   backtrace:
>     [<0000000057619e23>] kmemleak_alloc_recursive
> include/linux/kmemleak.h:55 [inline]
>     [<0000000057619e23>] slab_post_alloc_hook mm/slab.h:439 [inline]
>     [<0000000057619e23>] slab_alloc mm/slab.c:3326 [inline]
>     [<0000000057619e23>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x13d/0x280 mm/slab.c:3553
>     [<0000000086ce5479>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:547 [inline]
>     [<0000000086ce5479>] start_sync_thread+0x5d2/0xe10
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_sync.c:1862
>     [<000000001a9229cc>] do_ip_vs_set_ctl+0x4c5/0x780
> net/netfilter/ipvs/ip_vs_ctl.c:2402
>     [<00000000ece457c8>] nf_sockopt net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:106 [inline]
>     [<00000000ece457c8>] nf_setsockopt+0x4c/0x80
> net/netfilter/nf_sockopt.c:115
>     [<00000000942f62d4>] ip_setsockopt net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1258 [inline]
>     [<00000000942f62d4>] ip_setsockopt+0x9b/0xb0 net/ipv4/ip_sockglue.c:1238
>     [<00000000a56a8ffd>] udp_setsockopt+0x4e/0x90 net/ipv4/udp.c:2616
>     [<00000000fa895401>] sock_common_setsockopt+0x38/0x50
> net/core/sock.c:3130
>     [<0000000095eef4cf>] __sys_setsockopt+0x98/0x120 net/socket.c:2078
>     [<000000009747cf88>] __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2089 [inline]
>     [<000000009747cf88>] __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2086 [inline]
>     [<000000009747cf88>] __x64_sys_setsockopt+0x26/0x30 net/socket.c:2086
>     [<00000000ded8ba80>] do_syscall_64+0x76/0x1a0
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:301
>     [<00000000893b4ac8>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> 

The bug is that ownership of some memory is passed to a kthread started by
kthread_run(), but the kthread can be stopped before it actually executes the
threadfn.  See the code in kernel/kthread.c:

        ret = -EINTR;
        if (!test_bit(KTHREAD_SHOULD_STOP, &self->flags)) {
                cgroup_kthread_ready();
                __kthread_parkme(self);
                ret = threadfn(data);
        }

So, apparently the thread parameters must always be owned by the owner of the
kthread, not by the kthread itself.  It seems like this would be a common
mistake in kernel code; I'm surprised this doesn't come up more...

- Eric