[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190611134032.14656-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2019 21:40:32 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com>,
<jmorris@...ei.org>, <serge@...lyn.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static
Fix sparse warning:
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:202:23: warning:
symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index 1cc822a..cd1b728 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
};
/* An array of architecture specific rules */
-struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
+static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules);
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists