[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1560440297.4805.23.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:38:17 -0400
From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
To: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>, dmitry.kasatkin@...il.com,
jmorris@...ei.org, serge@...lyn.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ima: Make arch_policy_entry static
On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 21:40 +0800, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fix sparse warning:
>
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c:202:23: warning:
> symbol 'arch_policy_entry' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Thanks, this patch has been queued to be upstreamed.
Mimi
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> index 1cc822a..cd1b728 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ static struct ima_rule_entry secure_boot_rules[] __ro_after_init = {
> };
>
> /* An array of architecture specific rules */
> -struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
> +static struct ima_rule_entry *arch_policy_entry __ro_after_init;
>
> static LIST_HEAD(ima_default_rules);
> static LIST_HEAD(ima_policy_rules);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists