linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALMQjD-dAX8hU6sNxDWtdxc7CddO3KDd9Fu_J74tZ-6pn5_Z5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:04:28 +0200
From:   Kjetil Oftedal <oftedal@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     thuth@...hat.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0

On 13/06/2019, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
>
>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
>> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
>
> Applied.
>

Shouldn't the SPDX license identifiers in in arch/sparc/lib be adjusted to
reflect the original intent of LGPL licensing?

-
Kjetil Oftedal