linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20190613.151456.1482983218638838740.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:14:56 -0700 (PDT)
From:   David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:     oftedal@...il.com
Cc:     thuth@...hat.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0

From: Kjetil Oftedal <oftedal@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 00:04:28 +0200

> On 13/06/2019, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
>> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
>>
>>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
>>> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
>>
>> Applied.
>>
> 
> Shouldn't the SPDX license identifiers in in arch/sparc/lib be adjusted to
> reflect the original intent of LGPL licensing?

Yes, can someone cook up a quick patch for me for that?

Thanks.