linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190619075342.GA11485@yogzotot>
Date:   Wed, 19 Jun 2019 10:53:42 +0300
From:   Anatoly Pugachev <matorola@...il.com>
To:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     oftedal@...il.com, thuth@...hat.com, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        Kate Stewart <kstewart@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc: Remove redundant copy of the LGPL-2.0

On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 03:14:56PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > On 13/06/2019, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> >> From: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 27 May 2019 18:32:53 +0200
> >>
> >>> We already provide the LGPL-2.0 text in LICENSES/preferred/LGPL-2.0,
> >>> so there is no need for this additional copy here.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>
> >>
> >> Applied.
> >>
> > 
> > Shouldn't the SPDX license identifiers in in arch/sparc/lib be adjusted to
> > reflect the original intent of LGPL licensing?
> 
> Yes, can someone cook up a quick patch for me for that?
> 
> Thanks.

David,

can you please review this quick one? 

Thanks.

View attachment "0001-Update-arch-sparc-lib-to-LGPL-2.0-to-be-in-order-wit.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (31826 bytes)