linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm, thp: introduce FOLL_SPLIT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5A80A2B9-51C3-49C4-97B6-33889CC47F08@fb.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:57:30 +0000
From:   Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
CC:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "namit@...are.com" <namit@...are.com>,
        "peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "oleg@...hat.com" <oleg@...hat.com>,
        "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        "mhiramat@...nel.org" <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        "matthew.wilcox@...cle.com" <matthew.wilcox@...cle.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kernel Team <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mm, thp: introduce FOLL_SPLIT_PMD



> On Jun 13, 2019, at 5:57 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@...temov.name> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 03:03:17PM -0700, Song Liu wrote:
>> This patches introduces a new foll_flag: FOLL_SPLIT_PMD. As the name says
>> FOLL_SPLIT_PMD splits huge pmd for given mm_struct, the underlining huge
>> page stays as-is.
>> 
>> FOLL_SPLIT_PMD is useful for cases where we need to use regular pages,
>> but would switch back to huge page and huge pmd on. One of such example
>> is uprobe. The following patches use FOLL_SPLIT_PMD in uprobe.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>
>> ---
>> include/linux/mm.h |  1 +
>> mm/gup.c           | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> index 0ab8c7d84cd0..e605acc4fc81 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -2642,6 +2642,7 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> #define FOLL_COW	0x4000	/* internal GUP flag */
>> #define FOLL_ANON	0x8000	/* don't do file mappings */
>> #define FOLL_LONGTERM	0x10000	/* mapping lifetime is indefinite: see below */
>> +#define FOLL_SPLIT_PMD	0x20000	/* split huge pmd before returning */
>> 
>> /*
>>  * NOTE on FOLL_LONGTERM:
>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
>> index ddde097cf9e4..3d05bddb56c9 100644
>> --- a/mm/gup.c
>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
>> @@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 		spin_unlock(ptl);
>> 		return follow_page_pte(vma, address, pmd, flags, &ctx->pgmap);
>> 	}
>> -	if (flags & FOLL_SPLIT) {
>> +	if (flags & (FOLL_SPLIT | FOLL_SPLIT_PMD)) {
>> 		int ret;
>> 		page = pmd_page(*pmd);
>> 		if (is_huge_zero_page(page)) {
>> @@ -407,7 +407,7 @@ static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 			split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, address);
>> 			if (pmd_trans_unstable(pmd))
>> 				ret = -EBUSY;
>> -		} else {
>> +		} else if (flags & FOLL_SPLIT) {
>> 			if (unlikely(!try_get_page(page))) {
>> 				spin_unlock(ptl);
>> 				return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>> @@ -419,8 +419,40 @@ static struct page *follow_pmd_mask(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> 			put_page(page);
>> 			if (pmd_none(*pmd))
>> 				return no_page_table(vma, flags);
>> -		}
>> +		} else {  /* flags & FOLL_SPLIT_PMD */
>> +			unsigned long addr;
>> +			pgprot_t prot;
>> +			pte_t *pte;
>> +			int i;
>> +
>> +			spin_unlock(ptl);
>> +			split_huge_pmd(vma, pmd, address);
> 
> All the code below is only relevant for file-backed THP. It will break for
> anon-THP.

Oh, yes, that makes sense. 

> 
> And I'm not convinced that it belongs here at all. User requested PMD
> split and it is done after split_huge_pmd(). The rest can be handled by
> the caller as needed.

I put this part here because split_huge_pmd() for file-backed THP is
not really done after split_huge_pmd(). And I would like it done before
calling follow_page_pte() below. Maybe we can still do them here, just 
for file-backed THPs?

If we would move it, shall we move to callers of follow_page_mask()? 
In that case, we will probably end up with similar code in two places:
__get_user_pages() and follow_page(). 

Did I get this right?

> 
>> +			lock_page(page);
>> +			pte = get_locked_pte(mm, address, &ptl);
>> +			if (!pte) {
>> +				unlock_page(page);
>> +				return no_page_table(vma, flags);
> 
> Or should it be -ENOMEM?

Yeah, ENOMEM is more accurate. 

Thanks,
Song

> 
>> +			}
>> 
>> +			/* get refcount for every small page */
>> +			page_ref_add(page, HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>> +
>> +			prot = READ_ONCE(vma->vm_page_prot);
>> +			for (i = 0, addr = address & PMD_MASK;
>> +			     i < HPAGE_PMD_NR; i++, addr += PAGE_SIZE) {
>> +				struct page *p = page + i;
>> +
>> +				pte = pte_offset_map(pmd, addr);
>> +				VM_BUG_ON(!pte_none(*pte));
>> +				set_pte_at(mm, addr, pte, mk_pte(p, prot));
>> +				page_add_file_rmap(p, false);
>> +			}
>> +
>> +			spin_unlock(ptl);
>> +			unlock_page(page);
>> +			add_mm_counter(mm, mm_counter_file(page), HPAGE_PMD_NR);
>> +			ret = 0;
>> +		}
>> 		return ret ? ERR_PTR(ret) :
>> 			follow_page_pte(vma, address, pmd, flags, &ctx->pgmap);
>> 	}
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Kirill A. Shutemov