[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6f21c79d-5a80-ce3f-513c-0799145202ea@metux.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 20:45:02 +0200
From: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
To: Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
util-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches
On 14.06.19 17:45, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 14.06.19 16:20, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> Currently working through your branches. Smells like they really deserve
> a rebase and signed-off lines.
rebased/applied your patches and got test failures:
XFAIL: check-dot_entries
========================
Test check-dot_entries
First fsck run to check and fix error...
fsck.fat 4.1+git (2017-01-24)
/DIR
"." is not first entry. Can't fix this yet.
/DIR
".." is not second entry. Can't fix this yet.
check-dot_entries.img: 4 files, 3/63931 clusters
*** Error was not detected by fsck.
XFAIL check-dot_entries.fsck (exit status: 100)
XFAIL: check-huge
=================
Test check-huge
First fsck run to check and fix error...
Failed to read sector 167772191.
fsck.fat 4.1+git (2017-01-24)
Second fsck run to check if error was fixed...
Failed to read sector 167772191.
fsck.fat 4.1+git (2017-01-24)
*** Error was not fixed by fsck.
XFAIL check-huge.fsck (exit status: 1)
--mtx
--
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@...ux.net -- +49-151-27565287
Powered by blists - more mailing lists