linux-kernel - Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190614191053.22whtrb5f5uqis64@pali>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 21:10:53 +0200
From:   Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
To:     "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@...ux.net>
Cc:     util-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Help with reviewing dosfstools patches

On Friday 14 June 2019 17:45:20 Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> On 14.06.19 16:20, Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult wrote:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> Currently working through your branches. Smells like they really deserve
> a rebase and signed-off lines.

Every patch/pull request is mean to be based on current upstream
"master" branch.

As some of pull requests were opened long time ago, they are out-of-sync
from upstream "master" branch.

Currently I rebased and force-pushed those changes which had merge
conflict with upstream master branch.

And now on each pull request passed compilation and 'make check'.

-- 
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@...il.com

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)