linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 19/28] docs: powerpc: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rst

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:30:33 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@...il.com>,
        Russell Currey <ruscur@...sell.cc>,
        Sam Bobroff <sbobroff@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Manoj N. Kumar" <manoj@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Matthew R. Ochs" <mrochs@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Uma Krishnan <ukrishn@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Qiang Zhao <qiang.zhao@....com>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 19/28] docs: powerpc: convert docs to ReST and rename
 to *.rst

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 02:36:35PM -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jun 2019 14:52:55 -0300
> Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Convert docs to ReST and add them to the arch-specific
> > book.
> > 
> > The conversion here was trivial, as almost every file there
> > was already using an elegant format close to ReST standard.
> > 
> > The changes were mostly to mark literal blocks and add a few
> > missing section title identifiers.
> > 
> > One note with regards to "--": on Sphinx, this can't be used
> > to identify a list, as it will format it badly. This can be
> > used, however, to identify a long hyphen - and "---" is an
> > even longer one.
> > 
> > At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to
> > the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>
> > Acked-by: Andrew Donnellan <andrew.donnellan@....ibm.com> # cxl
> 
> This one fails to apply because ...
> 
> [...]
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst
> > index 83db42092935..acc21ecca322 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci-error-recovery.rst
> > @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ That is, the recovery API only requires that:
> >  .. note::
> >  
> >     Implementation details for the powerpc platform are discussed in
> > -   the file Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.txt
> > +   the file Documentation/powerpc/eeh-pci-error-recovery.rst
> >  
> >     As of this writing, there is a growing list of device drivers with
> >     patches implementing error recovery. Not all of these patches are in
> > @@ -422,3 +422,24 @@ That is, the recovery API only requires that:
> >     - drivers/net/cxgb3
> >     - drivers/net/s2io.c
> >     - drivers/net/qlge
> > +
> > +>>> As of this writing, there is a growing list of device drivers with
> > +>>> patches implementing error recovery. Not all of these patches are in
> > +>>> mainline yet. These may be used as "examples":
> > +>>>
> > +>>> drivers/scsi/ipr
> > +>>> drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2
> > +>>> drivers/scsi/qla2xxx
> > +>>> drivers/scsi/lpfc
> > +>>> drivers/next/bnx2.c
> > +>>> drivers/next/e100.c
> > +>>> drivers/net/e1000
> > +>>> drivers/net/e1000e
> > +>>> drivers/net/ixgb
> > +>>> drivers/net/ixgbe
> > +>>> drivers/net/cxgb3
> > +>>> drivers/net/s2io.c
> > +>>> drivers/net/qlge  
> 
> ...of this, which has the look of a set of conflict markers that managed
> to get committed...?

I don't see these conflict markers in my local branch or in
linux-next (next-20190614).

Let me know if I need to do something.

Bjorn