[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190614190606.559dc8dc@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:06:06 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
m68knommu tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
fs/binfmt_flat.c
between commit:
6071ecd874ac ("binfmt_flat: add endianess annotations")
from the m68knommu tree and commit:
db543c385059 ("fs/binfmt_flat.c: remove set but not used variable 'inode'")
from the akpm-current tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/binfmt_flat.c
index 80d902fb46e3,7562d6aefbe4..000000000000
--- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
@@@ -429,9 -415,7 +429,8 @@@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_
unsigned long textpos, datapos, realdatastart;
u32 text_len, data_len, bss_len, stack_len, full_data, flags;
unsigned long len, memp, memp_size, extra, rlim;
- u32 __user *reloc, *rp;
+ __be32 __user *reloc;
+ u32 __user *rp;
- struct inode *inode;
int i, rev, relocs;
loff_t fpos;
unsigned long start_code, end_code;
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists