linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the m68knommu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 11:32:18 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 m68knommu tree

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 07:06:06PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/binfmt_flat.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6071ecd874ac ("binfmt_flat: add endianess annotations")
> 
> from the m68knommu tree and commit:
> 
>   db543c385059 ("fs/binfmt_flat.c: remove set but not used variable 'inode'")

Maybe this should better be added to the maintainer tree as well..