lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 9 Jul 2019 09:21:11 +1000
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the
 m68knommu tree

Hi all,

On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 19:06:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/binfmt_flat.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   6071ecd874ac ("binfmt_flat: add endianess annotations")
> 
> from the m68knommu tree and commit:
> 
>   db543c385059 ("fs/binfmt_flat.c: remove set but not used variable 'inode'")
> 
> from the akpm-current tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc fs/binfmt_flat.c
> index 80d902fb46e3,7562d6aefbe4..000000000000
> --- a/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> +++ b/fs/binfmt_flat.c
> @@@ -429,9 -415,7 +429,8 @@@ static int load_flat_file(struct linux_
>   	unsigned long textpos, datapos, realdatastart;
>   	u32 text_len, data_len, bss_len, stack_len, full_data, flags;
>   	unsigned long len, memp, memp_size, extra, rlim;
>  -	u32 __user *reloc, *rp;
>  +	__be32 __user *reloc;
>  +	u32 __user *rp;
> - 	struct inode *inode;
>   	int i, rev, relocs;
>   	loff_t fpos;
>   	unsigned long start_code, end_code;

I am still getting this conflict (the commit ids may have changed).
Just a reminder in case you think Linus may need to know.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists