[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20190614112853.GC4325@krava>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:28:53 +0200
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@....com>
Subject: [RFC] perf/x86/intel: Disable check_msr for real hw
hi,
the HPE server can do POST tracing and have enabled LBR
tracing during the boot, which makes check_msr fail falsly.
It looks like check_msr code was added only to check on guests
MSR access, would it be then ok to disable check_msr for real
hardware? (as in patch below)
We could also check if LBR tracing is enabled and make
appropriate checks, but this change is simpler ;-)
ideas? thanks,
jirka
---
arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index 71001f005bfe..1194ae7e1992 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
#include <asm/intel-family.h>
#include <asm/apic.h>
#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
+#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
#include "../perf_event.h"
@@ -4050,6 +4051,13 @@ static bool check_msr(unsigned long msr, u64 mask)
{
u64 val_old, val_new, val_tmp;
+ /*
+ * Disable the check for real HW, so we don't
+ * mess up with potentionaly enabled regs.
+ */
+ if (hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_NATIVE))
+ return true;
+
/*
* Read the current value, change it and read it back to see if it
* matches, this is needed to detect certain hardware emulators
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists