linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] perf/x86/intel: Disable check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190614133350.GT3436@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 15:33:50 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:     Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@...gle.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] perf/x86/intel: Disable check_msr for real hw

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 01:28:53PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> the HPE server can do POST tracing and have enabled LBR
> tracing during the boot, which makes check_msr fail falsly.
> 
> It looks like check_msr code was added only to check on guests
> MSR access, would it be then ok to disable check_msr for real
> hardware? (as in patch below)
> 
> We could also check if LBR tracing is enabled and make
> appropriate checks, but this change is simpler ;-)
> 
> ideas? thanks,
> jirka
> 
> 
> ---
>  arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> index 71001f005bfe..1194ae7e1992 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
>  #include <asm/intel-family.h>
>  #include <asm/apic.h>
>  #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
> +#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
>  
>  #include "../perf_event.h"
>  
> @@ -4050,6 +4051,13 @@ static bool check_msr(unsigned long msr, u64 mask)
>  {
>  	u64 val_old, val_new, val_tmp;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * Disable the check for real HW, so we don't
> +	 * mess up with potentionaly enabled regs.
> +	 */
> +	if (hypervisor_is_type(X86_HYPER_NATIVE))
> +		return true;

Yeah, I think that works, or !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR).

>  	/*
>  	 * Read the current value, change it and read it back to see if it
>  	 * matches, this is needed to detect certain hardware emulators
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>