linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: tegra: Use rating when registering clock source

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190614145527.GJ15526@ulmo>
Date:   Fri, 14 Jun 2019 16:55:27 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clocksource: tegra: Use rating when registering
 clock source

On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 05:02:45PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 14.06.2019 16:53, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 04:29:17PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >> 14.06.2019 16:22, Thierry Reding пишет:
> >>> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 03:24:07PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> >>>> 14.06.2019 13:47, Thierry Reding пишет:
> >>>>> From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The rating is parameterized depending on SoC generation to make sure it
> >>>>> takes precedence on implementations where the architected timer can't be
> >>>>> used. This rating is already used for the clock event device. Use the
> >>>>> same rating for the clock source to be consistent.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>>  drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c | 2 +-
> >>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c b/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
> >>>>> index f6a8eb0d7322..e6608141cccb 100644
> >>>>> --- a/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
> >>>>> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/timer-tegra.c
> >>>>> @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int __init tegra_init_timer(struct device_node *np, bool tegra20,
> >>>>>  	sched_clock_register(tegra_read_sched_clock, 32, TIMER_1MHz);
> >>>>>  
> >>>>>  	ret = clocksource_mmio_init(timer_reg_base + TIMERUS_CNTR_1US,
> >>>>> -				    "timer_us", TIMER_1MHz, 300, 32,
> >>>>> +				    "timer_us", TIMER_1MHz, rating, 32,
> >>>>>  				    clocksource_mmio_readl_up);
> >>>>>  	if (ret)
> >>>>>  		pr_err("failed to register clocksource: %d\n", ret);
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Looks good. Although, could you please clarify whether arch-timer stops on T210 when CPU
> >>>> enters deepest (powerdown) idle state? I'm starting to lose track a bit already. Because
> >>>> if arch-timer stops in the deepest idle state, then it's a bit odd that Joseph didn't add
> >>>> the clocksource for T210 in the first place and v5.1 probably shouldn't work well because
> >>>> of that already.
> >>>
> >>> Yes, the architected timer doesn't work across an SC7 (which is what the
> >>> deepest idle state is called on Tegra210) transition, hence why we can't
> >>> use it as a suspend clocksource. I actually sent out a patch to do that,
> >>> earlier.
> >>>
> >>> And yes, it's entirely possible that v5.1 doesn't work in this regard,
> >>> but we're not noticing that because we don't have suspend/resume support
> >>> for Tegra210 anyway. There are a couple of missing pieces that we need
> >>> in order to make it work.
> >>>
> >>> This change in particular is only going to affect the CPU idle state
> >>> (CC7). Since the architected timer doesn't survive that either, we need
> >>> the Tegra timer to be preferred over the architected timer for normal
> >>> operation.
> >>>
> >>> All of these issues go away on Tegra186 and later, where the architected
> >>> timer is in an always-on partition and has a PLL that remains on during
> >>> SC7 (and CC7).
> >>
> >> Thank you very much for the clarification. But then what about the
> >> sched_clock? I suppose sched_clock will suffer on T210 as well and it's
> >> a bit trickier case because apparently arch-timer always wins since it
> >> has a higher precision. I guess the best solution will be to just bail
> >> out from arch-timer's driver probe in a case of T210.
> >>
> >> if (of_machine_is_compatible("nvidia,tegra210"))
> >> 	return 0.
> > 
> > I don't think there's any issue with the scheduler clock on Tegra210.
> > Before the CPU can be turned off, all tasks scheduled on that CPU have
> > to be migrated to another CPU, right? Conversely, before any tasks can
> > be scheduled on a CPU that CPU needs to be brought online, at which
> > point the architected timer should work fine again.
> 
> Is SC7 a CPU-idle state that cpuidle driver may enter or it's a
> system-wide suspend state? It's still not clear to me.

SC7 is the system-wide suspend state. When entered pretty much
everything in the SoC is turned off. The CPU idle state is called CC7,
but I think we only expose that via PSCI. However, I'm not sure we have
any extensive testing for that. I'll have to check that.

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)