[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <48877575-90b9-3db5-7a25-53cf3817b2ee@web.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:14:33 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jack Ping CHNG <jack.ping.chng@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: drivers: Provide devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()
>> I don't like adding new apis with no user.
>
> Perhaps Jack Ping will send it as a first patch of his series where he utilizes
> this functionality. Would it be acceptable?
The proposed function can get wider application in a reasonable time frame
if a corresponding script for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software)
would perform an automatic source code conversion (for example)
according to your change acceptance.
How do you think about to support a bit more collateral software evolution?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists