[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1906151044160.2614@hadrien>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 10:44:30 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jack Ping CHNG <jack.ping.chng@...ux.intel.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Enrico Weigelt <lkml@...ux.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: drivers: Provide devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname()
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019, Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> I don't like adding new apis with no user.
> >
> > Perhaps Jack Ping will send it as a first patch of his series where he utilizes
> > this functionality. Would it be acceptable?
>
> The proposed function can get wider application in a reasonable time frame
> if a corresponding script for the semantic patch language (Coccinelle software)
> would perform an automatic source code conversion (for example)
> according to your change acceptance.
> How do you think about to support a bit more collateral software evolution?
Why don't you just do what is asked for?
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists