[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74b6ab2e-09c0-a91d-6339-cb6b72eb4261@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 20:46:00 +0800
From: Yuehaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <nm@...com>, <t-kristo@...com>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<s-anna@...com>, <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] firmware: ti_sci: remove set but not used
variable 'dev'
Sorry, Pls ignore this, will fix the patch title
On 2019/6/15 20:38, YueHaibing wrote:
> Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
>
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
>
> Use the 'dev' variable instead of 'info->dev' to fix this.
>
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
> ---
> v2: use the 'dev' variable as Suman Anna's suggestion
> ---
> drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> index 86b2727..c8da6e2 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
> @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev,
> + dev_err(dev,
> "RM_RA:Message get config failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
> sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
> if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
> ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
> return ret;
> }
> req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
> @@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> + dev_err(dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
> goto fail;
> }
>
> @@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
>
> fail:
> ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
> - dev_dbg(info->dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
> + dev_dbg(dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
> return ret;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists