| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20190615125054.16416-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2019 20:50:54 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <nm@...com>, <t-kristo@...com>, <ssantosh@...nel.org>,
<s-anna@...com>, <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 -next] firmware: ti_sci: Fix gcc unused-but-set-variable warning
Fixes gcc '-Wunused-but-set-variable' warning:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2035:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2104:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2287:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c: In function ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg:
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c:2357:17: warning: variable dev set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
Use the 'dev' variable instead of info->dev to fix this.
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
v3: fix patch title
v2: use the 'dev' variable as Suman Anna's suggestion
---
drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
index 86b2727..c8da6e2 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/ti_sci.c
@@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Message config failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_ring_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox config send fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2071,7 +2071,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2115,7 +2115,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev,
+ dev_err(dev,
"RM_RA:Message get config failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2125,7 +2125,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "RM_RA:Mbox get config send fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2150,7 +2150,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_ring_get_config(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RM_RA:get config ring %u ret:%d\n", index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Message TX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2323,7 +2323,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Mbox send TX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2332,7 +2332,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_tx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "TX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%u\n", params->index, ret);
return ret;
}
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
sizeof(*req), sizeof(*resp));
if (IS_ERR(xfer)) {
ret = PTR_ERR(xfer);
- dev_err(info->dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Message RX_CH_CFG alloc failed(%d)\n", ret);
return ret;
}
req = (struct ti_sci_msg_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg_req *)xfer->xfer_buf;
@@ -2392,7 +2392,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
ret = ti_sci_do_xfer(info, xfer);
if (ret) {
- dev_err(info->dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
+ dev_err(dev, "Mbox send RX_CH_CFG fail %d\n", ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -2401,7 +2401,7 @@ static int ti_sci_cmd_rm_udmap_rx_ch_cfg(const struct ti_sci_handle *handle,
fail:
ti_sci_put_one_xfer(&info->minfo, xfer);
- dev_dbg(info->dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "RX_CH_CFG: chn %u ret:%d\n", params->index, ret);
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists