linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Introduce fits

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0g4shiz+Hq+0fS1GQjQX7tK5EyLiX-SOpDoTm4xswV8bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 09:26:49 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Introduce fits_capacity()

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 5:12 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> +Rafael
>
> On 17-06-19, 17:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:22:04AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > Hmm, even if the values are same currently I am not sure if we want
> > > the same for ever. I will write a patch for it though, if Peter/Rafael
> > > feel the same as you.
> >
> > Is it really the same variable or just two numbers that happen to be the
> > same?
>
> In both cases we are trying to keep the load under 80% of what can be supported.
> But I am not sure of the answer to your question.
>
> Maybe Rafael knows :)

Which variable?