lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 08:42:17 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, rafael@...nel.org Cc: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Introduce fits_capacity() +Rafael On 17-06-19, 17:02, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 08:22:04AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > Hmm, even if the values are same currently I am not sure if we want > > the same for ever. I will write a patch for it though, if Peter/Rafael > > feel the same as you. > > Is it really the same variable or just two numbers that happen to be the > same? In both cases we are trying to keep the load under 80% of what can be supported. But I am not sure of the answer to your question. Maybe Rafael knows :) -- viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists