linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/6] soc: qcom: add OCMEM driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF6AEGsoPNL52h5gEHP8UtmD9_MhX89E=aWiPZXS7zepykEMFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:29:47 -0700
From:   Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>
To:     Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, agross@...nel.org,
        David Brown <david.brown@...aro.org>,
        Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Jonathan <jonathan@...ek.ca>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        freedreno <freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] soc: qcom: add OCMEM driver

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 7:02 PM Brian Masney <masneyb@...tation.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rob Clark,
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 10:41:06AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.xml.h b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.xml.h
> >
> > I would prefer that these lived at the top of the c file, rather than
> > being generated.
>
> I think it would be nice to make this change as well.
>
> Rob C: Your original file ocmem.xml.h was licensed under the MIT
> license. I just wanted confirmation from you that it's OK to put
> the contents of that file into ocmem.c which has the GPL 2.0 only
> SPDX license tag. This will relicense the work. I imagine it's not
> an issue but I just wanted to get confirmation so there is no
> ambiguity regarding the licensing in the future.

fine by me.. I defaulted to generated headers since that is extremely
useful for gpu side of things (and userspace stuff defaults to MIT),
but probably overkill for ocmem which just has a handful of registers
(and no need for decoding userspace blob cmdstream dumps)

BR,
-R


>
> Brian
>
>
> >
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..b4bfb85d1e33
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/ocmem.xml.h
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@
> > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT */
> > > +
> > > +#ifndef OCMEM_XML
> > > +#define OCMEM_XML
> > > +
> > > +/* Autogenerated file, DO NOT EDIT manually!
> > > +
> > > +This file was generated by the rules-ng-ng headergen tool in this git repository:
> > > +http://github.com/freedreno/envytools/
> > > +git clone https://github.com/freedreno/envytools.git
> > > +
> > > +The rules-ng-ng source files this header was generated from are:
> > > +- /home/robclark/src/freedreno/envytools/rnndb/adreno/ocmem.xml         (   1773 bytes, from 2015-09-24 17:30:00)
> > > +
> > > +Copyright (C) 2013-2015 by the following authors:
> > > +- Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com> (robclark)
> > > +*/