[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2308e5da-a8fd-a0e6-f98c-0931a30baf14@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 19:52:06 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] soc/tegra: regulators: Add regulators coupler for
Tegra20
17.06.2019 18:46, Mark Brown пишет:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 02:59:03AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>
>> +config SOC_TEGRA20_VOLTAGE_COUPLER
>> + bool "Voltage scaling support for Tegra20 SoC's"
>
> SoCs
>
>> + depends on ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC
>
> Can we have an || COMPILE_TEST here please?
Good call!
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/tegra/regulators-tegra20.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,348 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>> +/*
>> + * Voltage regulators coupling resolver for NVIDIA Tegra20
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 GRATE-DRIVER project
>
> Please make the entire comment a C++ one so things look more
> intentional.
>
This is actually a correct SPDX comment style for the source files, accordingly to
checkpatch. While the C++ style should be used for header files only. I'm not
following the SPDX effort much, don't know from where these SPDX-style rules are
coming from.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists