linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] soc/tegra: regulators: Add regulators coupler for Tegra20

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 18:14:53 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] soc/tegra: regulators: Add regulators coupler for
 Tegra20

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 07:52:06PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> 17.06.2019 18:46, Mark Brown пишет:

> >> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
> >> +/*
> >> + * Voltage regulators coupling resolver for NVIDIA Tegra20
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2019 GRATE-DRIVER project

> > Please make the entire comment a C++ one so things look more
> > intentional.

> This is actually a correct SPDX comment style for the source files, accordingly to
> checkpatch. While the C++ style should be used for header files only. I'm not
> following the SPDX effort much, don't know from where these SPDX-style rules are
> coming from.

The SPDX bit is fine, what I'm saying is make the rest of the comment
also be a C++ comment.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)