[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bb84db4c-4d11-3199-ce96-3cd7c70ba911@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 20:19:05 +0300
From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/8] soc/tegra: regulators: Add regulators coupler for
Tegra20
18.06.2019 20:14, Mark Brown пишет:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 07:52:06PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> 17.06.2019 18:46, Mark Brown пишет:
>
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Voltage regulators coupling resolver for NVIDIA Tegra20
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2019 GRATE-DRIVER project
>
>>> Please make the entire comment a C++ one so things look more
>>> intentional.
>
>> This is actually a correct SPDX comment style for the source files, accordingly to
>> checkpatch. While the C++ style should be used for header files only. I'm not
>> following the SPDX effort much, don't know from where these SPDX-style rules are
>> coming from.
>
> The SPDX bit is fine, what I'm saying is make the rest of the comment
> also be a C++ comment.
>
Ah, I just realized that the "// " is the C++ comment style and not C. I can turn it
all into the C++, no problems.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists