linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: testmgr - dynamically allocate crypto

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20190618180748.GI184520@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jun 2019 11:07:48 -0700
From:   Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
        Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>,
        Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] crypto: testmgr - dynamically allocate
 crypto_shash

On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:21:53AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The largest stack object in this file is now the shash descriptor.
> Since there are many other stack variables, this can push it
> over the 1024 byte warning limit, in particular with clang and
> KASAN:
> 
> crypto/testmgr.c:1693:12: error: stack frame size of 1312 bytes in function '__alg_test_hash' [-Werror,-Wframe-larger-than=]
> 
> Make test_hash_vs_generic_impl() do the same thing as the
> corresponding eaed and skcipher functions by allocating the

Typo: "eaed" should be "aead"

> descriptor dynamically. We can still do better than this,
> but it brings us well below the 1024 byte limit.
> 
> Suggested-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
> Fixes: 9a8a6b3f0950 ("crypto: testmgr - fuzz hashes against their generic implementation")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> ---

Actual patch looks fine though.  Thanks!

Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>

- Eric