[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f6bc0fa-abcd-ce0a-19a0-a5767d094181@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2019 14:23:36 +0800
From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@...el.com>, pbonzini@...hat.com,
rkrcmar@...hat.com, corbet@....net, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, hpa@...or.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fenghua.yu@...el.com, jingqi.liu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] KVM: x86: add support for user wait instructions
On 6/19/2019 2:09 PM, Tao Xu wrote:
> UMONITOR, UMWAIT and TPAUSE are a set of user wait instructions.
> This patch adds support for user wait instructions in KVM. Availability
> of the user wait instructions is indicated by the presence of the CPUID
> feature flag WAITPKG CPUID.0x07.0x0:ECX[5]. User wait instructions may
> be executed at any privilege level, and use IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL MSR to
> set the maximum time.
>
> The behavior of user wait instructions in VMX non-root operation is
> determined first by the setting of the "enable user wait and pause"
> secondary processor-based VM-execution control bit 26.
> If the VM-execution control is 0, UMONITOR/UMWAIT/TPAUSE cause
> an invalid-opcode exception (#UD).
> If the VM-execution control is 1, treatment is based on the
> setting of the “RDTSC exiting” VM-execution control. Because KVM never
> enables RDTSC exiting, if the instruction causes a delay, the amount of
> time delayed is called here the physical delay. The physical delay is
> first computed by determining the virtual delay. If
> IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL[31:2] is zero, the virtual delay is the value in
> EDX:EAX minus the value that RDTSC would return; if
> IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL[31:2] is not zero, the virtual delay is the minimum
> of that difference and AND(IA32_UMWAIT_CONTROL,FFFFFFFCH).
>
> Because umwait and tpause can put a (psysical) CPU into a power saving
> state, by default we dont't expose it to kvm and enable it only when
> guest CPUID has it.
>
> Detailed information about user wait instructions can be found in the
> latest Intel 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual.
>
> Co-developed-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tao Xu <tao3.xu@...el.com>
> ---
>
> no changes in v4.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 6 ++++++
> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ++++
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> index a39136b0d509..8f00882664d3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_USE_GPA 0x01000000
> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC 0x00400000
> #define SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING 0x02000000
> +#define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE 0x04000000
>
> #define PIN_BASED_EXT_INTR_MASK 0x00000001
> #define PIN_BASED_NMI_EXITING 0x00000008
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index e18a9f9f65b5..48bd851a6ae5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -405,7 +405,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_ent(struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry, u32 function,
> F(AVX512VBMI) | F(LA57) | F(PKU) | 0 /*OSPKE*/ |
> F(AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ) | F(UMIP) | F(AVX512_VBMI2) | F(GFNI) |
> F(VAES) | F(VPCLMULQDQ) | F(AVX512_VNNI) | F(AVX512_BITALG) |
> - F(CLDEMOTE) | F(MOVDIRI) | F(MOVDIR64B);
> + F(CLDEMOTE) | F(MOVDIRI) | F(MOVDIR64B) | 0 /*WAITPKG*/;
>
> /* cpuid 7.0.edx*/
> const u32 kvm_cpuid_7_0_edx_x86_features =
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> index d6664ee3d127..fd77e17651b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h
> @@ -253,6 +253,12 @@ static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_tsc_scaling(void)
> SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING;
> }
>
> +static inline bool vmx_waitpkg_supported(void)
> +{
> + return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
> + SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE;
Shouldn't it be
return vmx->secondary_exec_control &
SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE; ?
> +}
> +
> static inline bool cpu_has_vmx_apicv(void)
> {
> return cpu_has_vmx_apic_register_virt() &&
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index b93e36ddee5e..b35bfac30a34 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2250,6 +2250,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
> SECONDARY_EXEC_RDRAND_EXITING |
> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML |
> SECONDARY_EXEC_TSC_SCALING |
> + SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE |
> SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_USE_GPA |
> SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_CONCEAL_VMX |
> SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC |
> @@ -3987,6 +3988,9 @@ static void vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
> }
> }
>
> + if (!guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_WAITPKG))
> + exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE;
> +
> vmx->secondary_exec_control = exec_control;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists